MNC Data Solutions
TRADING NETWORK ANALYSIS · 04

See the connections that isolated analysis can miss.

AI-assisted connection analysis — see who trades with whom: analytical relationships, beneficial-ownership context, and entities with access to both large client accounts and proprietary or personal accounts. Select a node to isolate its connections.

RELATIONSHIP GOVERNANCE

Every connection should show why it exists.

Separate known facts from observed patterns and confirmed relationships — with the evidence, source, timeframe, and confidence visible at every step.

KNOWNCustomer-provided

A relationship supplied through approved customer data.

Examples
•Common desk
•Account hierarchy
•Delegated authority
Evidence
Direct record
OBSERVEDAnalytically derived

A recurring pattern inferred from activity, instruments, timing, or outcomes.

Examples
•Shared securities
•Synchronized sessions
•Cross-market sequence
Evidence
Explainable inference
CONFIRMEDIndependently supported

A relationship supported by authoritative evidence or validated records.

Examples
•Verified ownership
•Validated organizational link
•Authoritative source match
Evidence
Corroborated record

Classification reflects evidence type — not a presumption about conduct.

EXPLAINABLE PATH · ENTITY A ↔ ENTITY BOBSERVED RELATIONSHIP · 86% CONFIDENCE
ENTITY A
→
17
synchronized sessions
Trade records · 90d
→
4
shared securities
Instrument map · 90d
→
Equity / options / futures sequence
Cross-market link · 60d
→
6
beneficiary-loss-bearer rotations
Outcome analysis · 4 cycles
→
ENTITY B
↑ Approved desk mapping · customer data↑
CONFIDENCE COMPOSITION
Approved desk mapping+35
Synchronized activity+22
Shared instruments+14
Outcome rotation+10
Cross-market continuity+5
TOTAL86 / 100
WEAK SIGNALS EXCLUDED
Single shared market windowBroad sector overlapOne common security

Confidence reflects support for the analytical connection, not legal or factual proof of a personal relationship.

EVIDENCE RETAINED
Source system
Record identifiers
Observation window
Method version
Analyst notes
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Does the pattern persist?
Is it specific to these entities?
Do independent evidence types agree?
INTERPRETATION BOUNDARY
⚠
ANALYTICAL RELATIONSHIP ≠ PERSONAL, LEGAL, OWNERSHIP, OR ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIP
Use the classification and evidence path exactly as shown; do not broaden the conclusion beyond the supporting record.
Illustrative entities, classifications, evidence paths, and confidence scores
CONTINUE THE STORY · 6 OF 8
NEXT · 7 OF 8Data AssuranceProve every expected record reached surveillance.
← Previous: Influence & Event Impact